A FB repost from a professional armourer overseas (Malta)

  • A FB repost from a professional armourer overseas (Malta)

  • Safety on the Set

    Fred Ginsburg CAS PhD

    Member
    2021-10-25 at 5:15 PM

    Our first post in this week’s series about our role as Film Armourers is dedicated to gun safety on set, with particular reference to the unfortunate incident which occurred last Thursday during the production of “Rust”, in which actor Alec Baldwin discharged a live round, killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza on a film set in New Mexico. This story has hit the headlines while the social media is buzzing with posts and comments that are misleading, to say the least.
    It is important to open this topic with a reassuring explanation of how Film Armourer services are regulated in Malta. Given this industry’s wide contribution to our country’s economy, the authorities have by and large ensured that standards be kept as high as possible. Any person who works in the ‘Armoury Department’ must be in possession of a Film Armourer permit issued by the Commissioner of Police to persons who already hold the highest level of firearms licence, which entails being knowledgeable and experienced in firearms handling and safety. At LSB we take it a step further by only engaging licensed armourers who have considerable know how through working alongside the most experienced armourers in the world. We are fortunate that most productions in Malta were initially serviced by British armourers, who follow very strict rules when carrying out their tasks. These were our mentors. A Police permit is issued for every production after we provide the list of locations where filming is to be carried out as well as the firearms required for the task. Finally, the Police detail experienced officers who accompany our team on set.
    Our inventory consists of real firearms as well as non-firing replicas. LSB has an impressive armoury which we regularly enhance with new additions to ensure that we can cover all historical periods and scenarios. We adapt our real firearms to fire blanks, using the British armourers’ methods which ensure that the firearms can be serviced and cleaned thoroughly after use, for maximum safety on set. Only blank rounds and inert dummy rounds are taken on set – live rounds should never be on set!
    The firearms that we take on set are only handled by us and cast members who we have trained to use them – training sessions and/or boot camps are held before filming commences and anyone who is deemed unfit to handle firearms is asked to go back home. Moreover, we are involved in writing the mandatory risk assessment which is circulated to the cast and crew before every filming day. Once we are on set, we have the final word when firearms are to be used. The director, crew and cast cannot proceed with filming unless we give the go-ahead, after confirming that filming can be conducted safely without any danger to cast and crew. We then follow and observe every cast member carrying and/or using a real firearm.
    We now come to the tragic event that occurred in New Mexico last Thursday. Based on what has been reported by trusted media sources, it would appear that some of the most fundamental rules governing the use of firearms on set were breached in the course of this production.
    The BBC reports that it obtained a document showing which crew members were listed as scheduled to be on set that day, naming a 24-year-old who was fulfilling the role of head armourer for the second time in her career. According to Reuters, Santa Fe Sheriff’s Department Detective Joel Cano stated that “the assistant director who handed Baldwin the prop gun did not know it contained live rounds” and that “the prop gun was one of three on a cart outside a building. One of them was taken by the assistant director on the movie who went inside and handed it to Baldwin. As the assistant director handed the gun to the actor Alec Baldwin, (he) yelled ‘cold gun’, indicating the prop gun did not have any live rounds”.
    Firstly, there should never have been any live rounds on set. Only inert rounds are used when simulating the loading of a firearm and these must be checked to ensure that the bullet is firmly attached to the cartridge. Secondly, the assistant director has no authority to handle firearms and issue them to cast members. That is strictly the armourer’s role.
    If the armourer was present, she should have been in control of the situation and not allowed this to happen. Being in that role takes much more than knowing how to handle guns safely. One must be assertive and able to be on top of every move by the directors, cast and crew. This is possibly the most challenging facet of being a film armourer, as one will occasionally encounter cocky, pushy and downright arrogant characters, who must be put in their place where gun safety is concerned. On the other hand, if the armourer was not present, then firearms and their ammunition should not have been there either.
    Production has a lot to answer for these serious shortcomings. Alec Baldwin, who is known to be anti-gun, is one of Rust’s two producers.
    Thankfully, such tragedies are extremely rare in the movie industry. When they did happen it was invariably the result of gross negligence or budgetary restrictions that compromised safety for the sake of profit. Despite this, there are uninformed sources from within and outside the industry who question the use of real firearms in film productions. They claim that shooting could be simulated through CGI. Nothing can be further from the truth. This clearly shows their lack of understanding of how firearms function and should look on screen. Our job is to achieve the greatest level of realism with maximum attention to safety measures.
    We take great pleasure in bringing you these daily snippets of arms history and we hope that you enjoy reading them. May we ask you to like and share to your timeline?

  • Safety on the Set

    Fred Ginsburg CAS PhD

    Member
    2021-10-25 at 5:18 PM

    Another FB repost from professional director Stephen Savage

    A DIRECTOR SPEAKS OUT
    I can’t tell you how angered I am over the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film, “Rust”. I’m not jumping on some high horse here. I wasn’t on that set so I have no idea what really happened, but to break it down to what is being reported, an assistant director apperently grabbed a “Prop Gun” off a weapons cart and handed it to actor Alec Baldwin, announcing that it was a “Cold” gun, meaning no projectile was in the weapon. Are you kidding me? Where was the armourer all this time, and why was an assistant director handling any weapons at all? A film with this kind of budget should have a full time armorer whenever weapons are anywhere near set. It’s the armourer’s job to give a safety talk each and every day weapons are to be used on set. That armourer (or a qualified assistant armorer) preps the weapon, loads the weapon with pre determined Blank loads or powder, then the armourer (and ONLY the armorer) brings the weapon to the set, and two things occur. The armourer hands the weapon to the actor only moments before the take, then the armourer immediately takes control of the weapon and preps it for the next take. That’s how it’s done… PERIOD. NO assistant director or anyone other than the armourer should be handling the weapon before it’s in the hands of the actor. I keep repeating the word “Weapon” because that’s what it is. If it’s firing blanks or caps or whatever. If it fires at all, it IS a Weapon. The term PROP GUN that’s being used here applies ONLY to replica guns that are not capable of firing. I have directed over a dozen westerns and have never handed a weapon to an actor. EVER! I work with a man named Rick Hodson, and that man takes his responsibilities as an armorer VERY seriously. He would NEVER leave weapons out on a cart for anyone to just grab. It’s not tragic what happened here. It’s criminal. And if people don’t go to prison over this, the industry itself is suspect in my opinion. This game of putting crew members and actors in jeopardy just to get The Shot, has got to stop. And where are the unions in all of this? Nowhere, that’s where. A dog gets injured slightly making a film and all of a sudden, it’s only CG dogs allowed on big projects. But crew members get shot or run over by trains or cut down by helicopter blades and suddenly everyone is silent. This industry is becoming a joke. There are protocols here that have been set up for a reason. FOLLOW THEM! And if everyone is so Anti-Gun in Hollywood, why do they keep making movies with guns? Because they are hypocrites, that’s why. It’s all about money. I for one will continue to be pro gun, and pro safety on all of my films. If you can’t agree here, you are obviously part of the problem.

Viewing 1 - 2 of 2 replies

Original Post
0 of 0 posts June 2018
Now