Naturalistic Dialogue | Script Writing Tips

Naturalistic Dialogue | Script Writing Tips

Share this post

By Loren-Paul Caplin

Replicating normal, everyday conversation is not what makes strong scripted dialogue. Real conversations are typically boring, off-point, and if efficient in some respects, not particularly entertaining, nor should it be.

In real life, we communicate for all sorts of reasons, and most of the reasons aren’t absolutely necessary. They often serve simple, human, and emotional needs.

Try to not communicate for an afternoon at home if you live with others and notice how essential communication is. So much of our talking to one another comes from our habit of interacting and sharing. We don’t want to feel lonely. What we say and talk about is fairly pointless in terms of the narratives of our lives. “How are you?” … “What’s going on?” … “Look at this,” etc. 

Our scripted stories are also not simply slices of uneventful living. They are heightened, hopefully interesting, and they aspire to be compelling.

Still, there are aspects of real life and real conversations that we can use toward consciously creating certain effects. When we speak of naturalistic dialogue, we are specifically thinking about the tics, rhythms, cadences, and other precise sonic aspects of how people actually speak. This also includes how those elements can be conveyed on the page, and to what effect.

We will also look at how understanding the themes and underlying ideas of your scripts can guide you to a host of various word and language usages in your dialogue.

Finally, the problems of exposition plague many writers. How do you get what you consider essential information to an audience or other characters while sounding natural?

Naturalistic Dialogue

When we think about ultra-real sounding characters, who comes to mind? Joe Swanberg’s characters in his anthology series, Easy? The characters in The Before Trilogy?

Larry David’s characters on the television sitcom, Curb Your Enthusiasm? The vast majority of Curb Your Enthusiasm’s dialogue is invented and spoken spontaneously and improvisationally. It is not scripted.

In a certain respect, conversations without verbal tics, the ums and the ahs, might be the equivalent of scripted drama without the humdrum, realistically boring parts.

Or, like when you watch a nature documentary on leopards, it’s nearly impossible to viscerally convey the vast majority of the time that leopards just lie around without it being mind-numbingly boring. What we see is the tiny amount of action in their lives, when they hunt or mate. These are active, visual events. But what about the rest of the time? What about the ums and ahs that make up and take up a lot of the time and space of realistic conversation?

Whether you strive for dialogue that sounds absolutely pitch-perfect or not, it should still be purposeful, not boring, and should not take up unnecessary real estate.

It’s a known trick among journalists, that if they perfectly replicate their interview subjects word-for-word, they can spin it so they appear awkward and stupid.

The main purpose of replicating exact aspects of language on the page would be to better articulate a character’s personality, and to give actors those precise idiosyncratic mannerisms of speech to help them create singular characters.

Woody Allen has nearly pioneered the path of literally writing out dialogue in a naturalistic way, with all the verbal tics included. In doing so, he’s able to conjure the nuanced neurosis of his characters.

Read (and listen to) this excerpt, from the film, Annie Hall (1977):

ANNIE

Alvy, I …

ALVY

What-what-what-what’s the matter?

ANNIE

I-you know, I don’t wanna.

ALVY

(Overlapping Annie, reacting)

What-what-I don’t … It’s not natural!

We’re sleeping in a bed together. You

know, it’s been a long time.

ANNIE

I know, well, it’s just that-you know,

I mean, I-I-I-I gotta sing tomorrow

night, so I have to rest my voice.

 

Or this excerpt from Noah Baumbach’s film, Marriage Story (2019):

NICOLE

I want a…I don’t know, I’m trying to

say this as undramatically as possible.

I want an ENTIRELY different kind of life.

 

Or this from TV series, Girls (2012), written by Lena Dunham:

HANNAH

No, now. I need you to read them

now. Because… I feel like I’ve

been hiding something from you.

(pause)

I don’t want to freak you out,

but…

(pause)

I think I may be the voice of my

generation.

(pause)

At least a voice. A strong voice.

 

Quick Reminders and Tips

  • Let Commas, Capitalizing, Question Marks, Exclamation Points, (Pauses), Em-dashes and Ellipsis help you finely articulate singular, precisely mannered dialogue and sounds and verbal tics. Examples: sllurrring, stu-stut-stuttering, lithping, or mummberbling. And in the process, you can convey the nuanced, complex manners that your characters’ minds work.
  • Real people pause, interrupt, stutter, speak in fragments, say random things/thoughts, talk over each other, don’t acknowledge, don’t complete their sentences, repeat themselves, and wander off.
  • Real language is full of ums, ahs, and whatshamacallits, etc., as placeholders for gaps in thinking or lapses in memory.
  • People sometimes say the wrong word by accident or through a misunderstanding of its meaning. end mark

 

Loren-Paul Caplin, Script Writer, Screenwriter, Screenplay Writer

Loren-Paul Caplin has written feature films and TV scripts for studios and independents, including Paramount, Universal, Sony, and Fox Searchlight. He teaches and has taught screenwriting at Columbia University, NYU/Tisch Department of Dramatic Writing, The New School (where he co-authored the Screenwriting Certificate Curriculum), and Hofstra University. He also wrote/directed the feature film, The Lucky Ones (Tribeca Film Festival, 2003), the short film, The History of the World in 8 Minutes, (New Directors/New Films Festival, MoMA), as well as several plays, and has done commentary for Criterion Collection and is a screenwriting consultant. Visit his website at lorenpaulcaplin.com and IMDB page at www.imdb.com/name/nm0135269.

Responses